Dual Coding and Language Learning: Drawing as Cognitive Support
Downloads
Abstract
As artificial intelligence in language teaching rapidly develops, there is a definitive necessity for reconsideration of the manner in which students operate with the newly appearing vocabulary and build meaning. This paper applies the dual coding theory and wider concepts of human cognition to determine the specification of drawing as a teaching approach. Even though AI tools can help one to become more efficient and personalized, they promote superficial engagement with the language as well. In comparison, drawing asks the learner to actively interpret and give meaning to the work, making connections between the systems of the verbal and the visual in a manner that enhances the role of form and meaning. Based on studies of the development of cognitive psychology, second language acquisition, and education, this paper summarizes both theoretical and classroom-based constructs that drawing is a teaching and learning strategy based on conceptual analysis as its major approach. The paper explains that drawing is far beyond a technique of memorization. Students are recomposing linguistic information when engaged in constructing their own visual images, and they make deliberate personal decisions concerning meaning. This further involvement promotes semantic encoding and more retention in the long run. Text planning, lexical retrieval, and language production in general are also supported by drawing. Instead of considering drawing as a substitute for technological innovation, this paper proposes that it is complementary in a digitally mediated classroom. Cognitive processes of humans will stay the key in second language acquisition into the twenty-first century; thus, drawing remains an instrumental process of second language education in the world where automation effects become more prominent.Keywords:
Dual Coding Theory, Drawing as Pedagogy, Second Language Acquisition, Semantic Encoding, Vocabulary Retention, Generative LearningIntroduction audio
A spoken introduction to this research.
Research ID
Universal Unique Research ID
ed8cc348-8421-4808-a64b-4dedb9d025bbReferences
Adoniou, M. (2013). Drawing to support writing development in English language learners. Language and Education, 27(3), 261–277.
Alhachami, Q. J. A. (2025). Der Einsatz von Malaktivitäten im Deutsch als Fremdsprache-Unterricht [The use of drawing activities in German as a foreign language instruction]. Mağallaẗ Wāsiṭ li-l-ʿulūm al-insāniyyaẗ, 21(3), 1419–1443.
Kassim, W. Z. W. (2018). Utilising Dual Coding Theory and animated images to enhance ESL students’ vocabulary learning. The English Teacher, 47(3).
Matorina, N., Meade, M. E., Starenky, J., & Barense, M. (2024). Drawing promotes memory retention in a patient with anterograde amnesia. Memory & Cognition.
Peterson, J. J. (2021). Visible thinking: A distributed cognitive process to self-manage cognitive load. United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Shahnaei, H. (2021). The effect of drawing pictures on improving Iranian elementary EFL learners' L2 vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research.
Shoari, E., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Involvement Load Hypothesis: The effect of drawing relevant pictures on Iranian young EFL learners’ L2 vocabulary performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), 195–202.
Teemueangsai, S., Sukying, A., & Min, C. (2025). Using drawing games to enhance second language vocabulary knowledge in Thai EFL learners. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 15(11).
Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1752–1776.
Wammes, J. D., Roberts, B. R., & Fernandes, M. A. (2018). Task preparation as a mnemonic: The benefits of drawing (and not drawing). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(6), 2365–2372.
Copyright & reuse
© 2026 Labidi Bouabdallah, Edward Hogshire. Authors retain copyright in their work. Reuse is permitted under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 when the authors and original publication are credited.
License terms · Copyright policy
Disclaimer
The claims in this article belong to its authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions, Boston Research Journals, editors or reviewers. Publication does not constitute endorsement of a product or manufacturer’s claim.
Published
Issue
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Boston Research Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication record
- Accepted
- 2026-07-10
- Published
- 2026-07-31
- Pages in issue
- 55 - 63
- Online ISSN
- 2834-4863
- Print ISSN
- 2834-4855
Peer reviewed research
Review by at least two independent experts under a double-blind process.
Peer review process ↗Copyright & access
🟢 Open Access | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
View license terms ↗Preservation & archival
Long-term preservation with BRJ Cloud.
View archival policy ↗Published by BRJ
Compiled and published in the United States of America.
About Boston Research Journals ↗