Exploring English Language Needs: An In-Depth Analytical Approach
Downloads
Abstract
This study explores the English language needs of students through a quantitative analytical approach, identifying key areas where learners require support in their linguistic development. By employing structured surveys and statistical analysis, the study examines students' proficiency levels, challenges, and specific requirements in reading, writing, listening, and speaking. The findings reveal significant gaps in academic and communicative English skills, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study concludes with recommendations for curriculum development, instructional strategies, and policy improvements to enhance English language acquisition among students.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63942/brjssh.v5.i7.p35.59980Keywords:
curriculum development, English language needs, instructional strategies, language proficiency, quantitative analysisIntroduction audio
A spoken introduction to this research.
Research ID
Universal Unique Research ID
c5979270-a826-4202-a723-31a84288d182Figures
Select a figure to view the full image.
References
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL program design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 63–78). Cambridge University Press.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Heinle & Heinle.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Jasso-Aguilar, R. (1999). Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis: A critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 27–46.
Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2008). Age-related differences in motivation and second language acquisition. Language Learning, 58(2), 327–355.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Long, M. H. (Ed.). (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum: A study in second language education. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall.
Seedhouse, P. (1995). Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT Journal, 49(1), 59–65.
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1–19.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Copyright & reuse
© 2025 Dr. Elenita P. Galvez. Authors retain copyright in their work. Reuse is permitted under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 when the authors and original publication are credited.
License terms · Copyright policy
Disclaimer
The claims in this article belong to its authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions, Boston Research Journals, editors or reviewers. Publication does not constitute endorsement of a product or manufacturer’s claim.
Published
Issue
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Boston Research Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication record
- Accepted
- 2025-09-01
- Published
- 2025-09-15
- Pages in issue
- 35 - 44
- Online ISSN
- 2834-4863
- Print ISSN
- 2834-4855
Peer reviewed research
Review by at least two independent experts under a double-blind process.
Peer review process ↗Copyright & access
🟢 Open Access | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
View license terms ↗Preservation & archival
Long-term preservation with BRJ Cloud.
View archival policy ↗Published by BRJ
Compiled and published in the United States of America.
About Boston Research Journals ↗Share this research
